International Surrogacy

Search in blog

Shop By

  • Keyword
  • Release date
  • Tags

Search in blog mobile

Shop By

  • Keyword
  • Release date
  • Tags
Saturday, 07 July 2018 09:16

Cancer Patients Pay Thousands To Save Their Fertility

Ukrainian Surrogacy is and Excellent and Affordable Path to Parenthood for Cancer Survivors

Cancer treatment can leave patients infertile or sterile. Ukrainian surrogacy is so much less expensive than surrogacy in the US. It is a great option for couples who have survived cancer and cannot carry a pregnancy. Egg donation is also extremely affordable. Surrogacy programs start under $50,000 all inclusive at Delivering Dreams International Surrogacy and egg donation $2000.

By Anna Almendrala

When Victoria Dzorka learned that she had Hodgkin lymphoma in January 2017, she sat down to write out her questions for the oncologist. At the top of the list was a concern about how the treatment might affect her future fertility.

Dzorka had just watched her sister go through treatment for another cancer, and cried with her after doctors told her the treatment might leave her infertile. So Dzorka, 25 and newly married, knew firsthand that infertility was a potential side effect of cancer treatment. She wanted to explore ways to preserve her ability to have biological children before starting chemotherapy.

The best way to hedge against the ovary-aging effects of chemotherapy, the fertility doctor told her, would be to squeeze in an in vitro cycle before her treatment and make embryos with her husband’s sperm. The catch: The IVF cycle had to start the next business day, and she needed to show up with $15,000 in cash.

Dzorka was a grad student with no income in Roseville, California, and she knew she personally couldn’t come up with that kind of money. Dzorka’s mother, while supportive of Dzorka’s wish to have children, also couldn’t afford the price tag.

Dzorka’s life was on the line, and cancer treatment couldn’t wait while she tried to raise funds for the IVF procedure. She decided to go ahead with the chemotherapy after assurances that the fertility doctor would do everything to help her conceive after her cancer was treated.


Victoria Dzorka was faced with an impossible choice. If she wanted to do an IVF cycle before chemotherapy, she needed to come up with $15,000 in cash immediately. She didn’t have the money, and went through with the chemo. Now she wonders what her chances are of getting pregnant.
Her six-month chemotherapy regimen is over and she’s continuing to recover. Specifically, Dzorka, now 27, is waiting on word from her doctors about a clean bill of health, which would give her the clearance to start trying to have a family.

But until that happens, she said, knowing that it might be difficult for her to become pregnant in the future makes it hard to watch other people in her life move forward with pregnancies, birth and parenthood. She especially hates fielding those seemingly innocuous questions, commonly aimed at young married couples, about when she plans to have children.

“You’re always reminded of the potential that [fertility] has been taken,” she said. “I can pretend that I’m fine and that I don’t think about it and that I am totally accepting of one or the other realities, but obviously I would prefer to not have had to make that decision.”

Anywhere from 20 to 70 percent of people who undergo cancer treatment will be rendered infertile by chemotherapy or radiation, and those who are treated with surgery that removes organs like the ovaries or testicles are rendered sterile. This range of potential effects on fertility means that some will struggle to conceive, and might never be able to have genetically related children or carry a pregnancy to term.

Several studies comparing the IVF results of cancer patients who do IVF either before or after chemotherapy demonstrate how crucial it is to bank eggs or embryos before undergoing treatment that can be toxic to the sex organs. For instance, women who did IVF after chemotherapy were more than five times more likely to have the cycle canceled due to a complete lack of ovarian response to the fertility drugs, compared to those who never had chemotherapy. Another comparison showed that women who did fertility preservation before cancer treatment produced more eggs and embryos than those who did IVF after cancer treatment.

Experts say that cost is the most significant barrier between cancer patients and fertility preservation. On GoFundMe, a platform people use to raise money for personal goals, 73 campaigns mention the phrase “fertility preservation” in their appeal for money ― a drop in the bucket compared to the approximately 70,000 reproductive-age people who are diagnosed with cancer every year.

While treatment for infertility is expensive, it is sometimes covered by insurance. Fertility preservation generally is not, explained Barbara Collura, president and CEO of the nonprofit infertility advocacy group Resolve. For men who want to save sperm, collection and storage cost only a few hundred dollars. But for women, freezing eggs can cost $10,000 or more.

This means most female cancer patients of childbearing age in the U.S. are faced with the prospect of having to rapidly raise thousands of dollars to freeze eggs or embryos before chemotherapy begins ― usually within days or weeks of a cancer diagnosis, itself a disorienting and expensive life event.  

As a way to fix this oversight, fertility advocates like the Alliance for Fertility Preservation and the group that it co-founded, the Coalition to Protect Parenthood After Cancer, have begun lobbying state legislatures to change the definition of infertility to include people about to undergo cancer treatment. These bills, which have already become law in Rhode Island, Connecticut and Maryland, amend pre-existing infertility treatment mandates to include people who technically are not infertile, but who will be rendered so by cancer treatment.

Why insurance companies don’t typically cover fertility preservation

Insurance coverage for infertility in general is extremely spotty in the U.S. Fifteen states have passed laws that require private insurers to cover or offer coverage for infertility diagnosis and treatment ― though not all of them require insurance plans to cover in vitro fertilization, the gold standard of infertility treatment.

Fertility preservation is even less likely to be covered, for a number of complex reasons. First, egg freezing was considered experimental until 2012, when the American Society of Reproductive Medicine named it a standard infertility treatment, and insurance companies tend to shy away from covering experimental treatments.

And only about 5 percent of new cancer diagnoses in the U.S. are among people ages 15 to 39 ― those most likely to need fertility preservation ― meaning this was a small patient population that may have flown under the radar for a long time.

Finally, people diagnosed with cancer don’t meet the medical definition of “infertility,” which is the inability to get pregnant after a year of unprotected sex. Instead, in the eyes of insurers, they are merely about to become infertile. This technicality precluded fertility preservation coverage in states that mandate infertility treatment coverage. To expand infertility coverage to include cancer patients, legislators in Connecticut, Rhode Island and Maryland amended their laws to include people for whom fertility treatment is a medical necessity.
New York and Delaware are also debating similar legislation, and a bill in Illinois has passed both houses and is on the governor’s desk for consideration. At the federal level, Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) have introduced legislation that would require private insurers, as well as some government plans, to cover infertility treatments in general, including for people about to undergo cancer treatments.

While good news for infertility advocates and cancer patients, these state amendments, if passed, would still not guarantee universal coverage of fertility preservation procedures. State insurance mandates only apply to private health plans that are fully insured, as opposed to self-funded health plans run by corporations, or people who buy insurance individually. And of course, they don’t apply to federal health plans like Medicaid or Medicare.  

This means that only about a quarter of the people in Connecticut and Rhode Island will have the new benefit. In Connecticut, about 54 percent of the population gets health insurance through an employer, and of these, about 50 percent have coverage from fully insured plans and thus would benefit from this law. In Rhode Island, these numbers are 51 percent and 53 percent, respectively.

Cancer patients on a federal health plan wouldn’t have access to this fertility preservation procedure ― something that Booker and DeLauro’s bill addresses by mandating coverage for people who get their care from Tricare (the military benefits program), the Veterans Administration or the Federal Employees’ Health Benefits Program.

Medicaid is not included in the proposed legislation. This may be due to Medicaid’s historical role as a short-term, safety-net insurance plan for the poor, according to Sara Rosenbaum, a law professor at George Washington University’s Milken Institute School of Public Health.
“Medicaid is not going to pay for poor women to have more children,” Rosenbaum said. “I just think that the sense of Medicaid among most policymakers is that it’s a [short-term] gap program.” While Medicaid coverage has expanded, it’s very difficult to get and stay on it. Most adults who have Medicaid are off it in three or four years.

The new legislation faces resistance from the insurance industry, which has voiced concerns about costs. But insurance policy experts say there’s likely little reason to worry, given the small projected increase to insurance policy fees every month.
America’s Health Insurance Plans, the insurance industry’s largest lobbying group, says it is reviewing the impact of legislation in Rhode Island and Connecticut, according to spokeswoman Cathryn Donaldson. She expressed concern about the recent trend in a statement to HuffPost, saying it could increase premiums for consumers.

But Dr. Peter Hollmann, director of the Executive Master of Healthcare Leadership Program at Brown Medicine and former chief medical officer of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode Island, says it’s unlikely these laws would noticeably drive up premiums, because of how few people would use them and how relatively inexpensive the procedures are.

“This is just not the type of thing that’s going to add up,” Hollmann said. “The number of people that are going to work on infertility treatment is going to be a pretty small number of people.”
Indeed, a 2017 study commissioned by the Maryland Health Care Commission to analyze the effect of a fertility preservation mandate estimated that about 2,000 people in Maryland ages 10 to 44 may become infertile after a medical treatment every year ― and that efforts to preserve their fertility would cost each insurance holder an extra 24 cents per month.

Sperm collection costs an average of $500, according to the Maryland study, while an IVF cycle, which women can do to preserve their eggs or create embryos with a partner, costs an average of $12,400, according to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
The fertility preservation laws, however, do not mandate coverage for the long-term cost of storing eggs, sperm and embryo, which can cost several hundred dollars a year.

How fertility preservation can change the experience of cancer treatment

Because the laws are still so recent, there isn’t any official data on how many people have taken advantage of the new benefit. But anecdotal evidence from fertility centers in the two states where the laws have taken effect suggests that patients are benefiting from the new coverage.

Compared to the first quarters of the past two years, there has been no change in fertility preservation consultations or cycles at the Center for Advanced Reproductive Services, Connecticut’s largest fertility clinic, according to CEO Paul Verrastro.

“Although having the [law] is a good thing ― and it certainly puts people at ease a lot sooner ― we had pretty good utilization before the change went into effect,” Verrastro said of his clinic, which offered deep discounts and financing plans to cancer patients before the state mandate was on the books.

In Rhode Island, where the law has been in effect since July 2017, referrals for consultations and egg retrieval cycles have increased three- or fourfold, according to Dr. Eden Cardozo, who works at the Women and Infants Fertility Center.

Before the law went into effect, cancer patients would be referred to Cardozo’s clinic, which is the only fertility clinic in Rhode Island, but then would decline an initial consultation upon learning that their insurance wouldn’t cover the appointment. This is what initially spurred Cardozo to help craft the legislation.

The fruits of Rhode Island’s legislation can be seen in Thomeeka Speaks’ case ― a major contrast to Dzorka’s story.

The 22-year-old Rhode Island resident had no means to pay for a cycle of egg freezing in between her chemotherapy cycles for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Speaks, who is the youngest of five children and an aunt to five nieces and nephews, knew she wanted to be a mother one day, and didn’t hesitate when doctors asked if she wanted to take the time to freeze her eggs. Because of the new state amendment, her cycle was fully covered.

Speaks said the coverage was so streamlined that she didn’t have to chat with the insurance company once, or deal with any logistical problems. In fact, she was surprised to learn that the state legislature had only recently changed the law to make sure fertility preservation measures were considered a standard benefit for cancer care.


Thomeeka Speaks, 22, had her egg freezing cycle fully covered thanks to Rhode Island’s new fertility preservation mandate. She says she doesn’t know what she would have done if the cycle hadn’t been fully covered by insurance.

The movement to ensure fertility preservation access for cancer patients continues nationwide, and is being led by the people most affected. After her treatment, Dzorka decided to write her graduate thesis on oncofertility preservation issues, and testified before the California Senate health committee in favor of SB 172, a bill that would have required insurance companies to cover fertility preservation treatment when medically necessary.
That bill died in the state Senate, but the fight isn’t over. Advocates still hope that fertility preservation coverage can be achieved by other means besides crafting legislation, in California and elsewhere. For instance, the fertility preservation coalition is also trying to approach different state insurance commissioners directly to see if coverage can be achieved without a state law, and they hope to attract the attention of larger cancer advocacy organizations to shed more light on the issue.

Dzorka thinks these laws are vital ― not just for women who struggle to afford the fertility preservation, but for cancer patients who are never even asked if they want to consider fertility treatment in the first place. Making fertility preservation a standard part of cancer treatment will help to make care more equitable in general, and less reliant on a doctor’s personal judgment about someone’s ability to pay. 

“There are women who maybe look different than me, or come from a different background than I did, whose doctor may have made an assumption about them,” she said. “[That] they weren’t worthy of that conversation, or just assumed that they wouldn’t even be able to pay ― so why even bother to talk to them about their fertility?”

CORRECTION: A previous version of this story incorrectly indicated that Paul Verrastro was a doctor, and misstated his title as COO of the Center for Advanced Reproductive Services. He is the company’s CEO.

Learn more about international surrogacy:
Delivering Dreams helps couples throughout the US struggling with infertility have children. Located in NJ and Kyiv, Ukraine, our amazing medical facilities and professionals, surrogates and donors are in Ukraine, because Ukrainian law protects the rights of parents and their children from inception at affordable costs and high success rates.

Unique to Delivering Dreams, we offer guaranteed not to exceed, all-inclusive pricing and contracts under US law to provide prospective parents legal and financial security.

1 in 6 couples are struggling with infertility. You are not alone. We want to be your path to parenthood.

Would you like to learn more? Please contact us to share your challenges, ask questions and discuss solutions. This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.,1.908.386.3864.

International surrogacy made simple!

Our upcoming book, “Successful Surrogacy: Your Guide to Realizing Your Dreams of Parenthood Through Ukrainian Surrogacy” reveals the process, details and answers to empower you to start your Ukrainian Surrogacy Journey and ensure it will be an affordable, secure and happy experience.

Pre-Order your advance copy today! Our book is FREE, but the results will be PRICELESS!


Read 1194 times


We have been very satisfied, I have been comfortable at the clinic and with my doctor. I was heard. I could ask any questions. I like you have hu-mor, despite the circumstances. Great clinic. Your service has been very good. You have been a huge support and very spacious. You have been available 24 hours a day. You have the answer to all the questions we have been asked. You have accommodated our nervousness, you have rejoiced with us, you have been there throughout. I could not have wished ...
Read more
A and S
The communication with surrogate is easy and better than what we expected. The updates are provided as scheduled with occasional surprises
The support was great. It was easy on us that the coordination was done by the delivering dreams team while being completely transparent with us on the progress. The communication with the delivering dreams team was always fast, responsive, and easy.
E and K
Thank you kate. You have been great today and all the other days ❤ you are a great team. We are very satisfied and happy for your help.
We were confident before in our choice, but this experience has confirmed beyond any doubt that we choose the best agency.
I loved working with Susan and her team and highly recommend them to anyone considering her services. She's is great at every aspect of a process and knows how to handle delicate matters.
Diana Lyakhovetska
Susan truly understands the needs of parents using surrogacy, and offers comprehensive emotional support to parents as they experience the journey!
Christine Hughes Pontier
The team at Delivering Dreams is amazing! Their attention to detail and ability to put your mind at ease while growing your family is like none other. They handled everything for us, and I never once doubted they would help us accomplish our dreams.
Margaret Jones
I’ve known Susan for several years now, and I’ve always been impressed by her attention to her clients’ needs. I’ve known her to work ardently and diligently to solve whatever challenges, no matter how unique, that prevent her clients from completing their families. She is a problem-solver, and she earnestly believes in providing the best options and in making surrogacy opportunities realities: this is not merely a business for Susan. She will help customize the process for your needs and to ...
Read more
Mary Woods
Susan has a keen sense of business and goes to the max to solve her clients’ problems. She is super knowledgeable on business, laws and how things work in surrogacy in general, and specifically on Ukrainian surrogacy. She is an advocate for transparency in a market that’s often opaque and full of hidden risks. I really enjoyed working with Susan. She really pays attention to detail and was always looking out for my best interest above all. Highly recommend!
Laurie Tham
Delivering Dreams goes above and beyond what other surrogacy agencies offer. After speaking with Susan, I see how they anticipate every part of the process, down to details that I had never even considered. I didn’t know what I didn’t know! Surrogacy can be really complicated and confusing. What an amazing sense of relief to have a company so dedicated to managing the WHOLE process and taking away as much of the stress as possible.
Kate Varness
I have gotten to know Susan through a group where we are members. I have found her to be a genuine and caring person. Her consideration for others and love of her work with Ukrainian surrogates and parents-to-be are evident in all her decision making. She is passionate about being a force for the greater good and helping where she can. I have been amazed at the way she is able to smoothly navigate the complicated maze of requirements in the surrogacy process. I am happy to give her my highest...
Read more
Rose Anne Barbour Huck
Susan Kibler is kind.  She clearly loves those she works with and loves what she does.  Susan listens deeply and compassionately and can make you laugh all in the space of one conversation.  She is wonderful!  If you are feeling worried, she'll hear you.  If you have questions, she will find answers for you. If you need help, she does her very best to support you.  I feel so fortunate to have found her and imagine you will too.
Frances Russell
Susan has the ability to really connect on a personal level quickly.  I have found her easy to talk to and have been so grateful for her guidance.  She is one of those people who offers so much to her clients.  She sees the big picture and has a heart for the most intimate concerns.  She is highly skilled and able to manage what can certainly be challenging and uncomfortable experiences, making them feel easier.  She will take charge at the perfect times and guide you when you really need her...
Read more
Susan Seare
The international surrogacy world is complicated. Susan Kibler knows its ins-and-outs. She knows the people and outfits you can trust and the ones to avoid. She insists on the best for her clients and handles the details so they don't have to worry about them. If you want to take the international surrogacy journey, you can trust Delivering Dreams International Surrogacy Agency to guide you on that path.
Nancy Linnerooth
My friend and I had a positive experience working with Susan. Susan is always super responsive and caring. She is very professional, helpful and reliable. My friend has soo much troubles trying having a baby for many years. My friend and her husband were about to give up their dream of having a baby. Susan Kersch Kibler found the way to help. She has unlimited energy, attentive to detail and super efficient. Great to work with!
Polina Clend
Susan is passionate about helping people become families. She is a trustworthy confidant to have on your side.
Kristen Ancker
Our experience with Delivering Dreams has been overwhelmingly positive. The team seems to be genuinely dedicated to helping us to realize our dream of having a child. The constant communication leading up to the trip and the numerous touch points made us feel comforted in what has been a very challenging and uncomfortable situation. We always had streamlined communication through the group chat and was frequently checked on during our stay.

Under Ukrainian law, surrogacy is a legal affordable option for traditionally married couples to have children using their own embryos, or with either an egg or sperm donor. There must be a medical reason you can’t carry a child. You are also able to participate if you have had 4 unsuccessful IVF attempts.


Under Ukrainian law, surrogacy is a legal affordable option for traditionally married couples to have children using their own embryos, or with either an egg or sperm donor. There must be a medical reason you can’t carry a child. You are also able to participate if you have had 4 unsuccessful IVF attempts.